Weekly Bulletin
The FIM provides a Newsletter called FIM Weekly Bulletin, which is a selection of the mathematics seminars and lectures taking place at ETH Zurich and at the University of Zurich. It is sent by e-mail every Tuesday during the semester, or can be accessed here on this website at any time.
Subscribe to the Weekly Bulletin
FIM Weekly Bulletin
×
Modal title
Modal content
| Monday, 29 June | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| — no events scheduled — |
| Tuesday, 30 June | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Time | Speaker | Title | Location |
| 13:15 - 14:00 |
Tim Gehrunger ETH Zurich, Department of Mathematics |
Abstract
Can commercially available LLMs solve research-level mathematics problems? Can mathematicians use these models to support their own research?
The current answer to both questions seems to be a cautious “yes,” which grows less cautious over time. In this talk, I will give an overview of the mathematical reasoning abilities of current state-of-the-art models, with a special focus on agentic systems. I will also highlight best practices, limitations, and open questions surrounding the use of AI in mathematical research.
Research Seminar in StatisticsAgentic AI for the Working Mathematicianread_more |
HG G 19.2 |
| Wednesday, 1 July | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| — no events scheduled — |
| Thursday, 2 July | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Time | Speaker | Title | Location |
| 14:00 - 14:45 |
Giangiacomo Mercatalicall_made Haute Ecole de Gestion de Genève |
Abstract
Diffusion and flow-matching models have become the default tools for generative modeling,
but in scientific and structured domains their value depends on one ability: to generate
not just plausible samples, but samples that satisfy prescribed constraints and guidance
signals — known physics, structure, and target properties. Such requirements come in
several distinct types, and a generative model has to be designed in a specific way to
accommodate each. This talk frames a line of work around that question — how do we build
diffusion and flow models that respect different kinds of constraints? — and presents one
design per type.
The first type is conditioning on target properties: a score-based diffusion with
co-evolving processes that exchange information through loop guidance, steering generation
toward desired attributes. The second is structural: a continuous-time flow constrained by
a causal dependency graph, learned jointly with the dynamics of interacting time series.
The third is partial physics: when the governing equations are known only in part, a
grey-box flow-matching model embeds the available physics while a structured latent absorbs
the unknown parameters and stochasticity. The fourth is hard physical constraints —
conservation laws, boundary conditions — enforced at sampling time by projecting generation
onto the constraint manifold.
Talks in Financial and Insurance MathematicsConstraining Generative Models: Conditioning, Structure, and Physics in Diffusion and Flowsread_more |
HG F 26.5 |
| Friday, 3 July | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Time | Speaker | Title | Location |
| 13:30 - 15:00 |
Prof. Dr. Longting Wu SUSTECH |
Abstract
I will first review the Virasoro constraints for Gromov–Witten theory and the curve case proved by Okounkov and Pandharipande. I will then discuss ongoing work on extending these constraints to orbifold curves using degeneration techniques.
Algebraic Geometry and Moduli SeminarVirasoro constraints for orbifold curvesread_more |
HG G 43 |