> simulation by means of second-kind Galerkin boundary element method.>> Source: Elke Spindler "Second-Kind Single Trace Boundary Integral>> Formulations for Scattering at Composite Objects", ETH Diss 23620, 2016."" > > simulation by means of second-kind Galerkin boundary element method.>> Source: Elke Spindler "Second-Kind Single Trace Boundary Integral>> Formulations for Scattering at Composite Objects", ETH Diss 23620, 2016."" > Research reports – Seminar for Applied Mathematics | ETH Zurich

Research reports

Residual smoothing techniques: do they improve the limiting accuracy of iterative solvers?

by M. H. Gutknecht and M. Rozloznik

(Report number 1999-22)

Abstract
Many iterative methods for solving linear systems, in particular the biconjugate gradient (\BICG) method and its "squared" version \CGS (or \BICGS), produce often residuals whose norms decrease far from monotonously, but fluctuate rather strongly. Large intermediate residuals are known to reduce the ultimately attainable accuracy of the method, unless special measures are taken to counteract this effect. One measure that has been suggested is residual smoothing: by application of simple recurrences, the iterates $\bfx_n$ and the corresponding residuals {\bf r}$_n \DEF$ {\bf b} - {\bf A} {\bf x}$_n$ are replaced by smoothed iterates ${\bf y}_n$ and corresponding residuals ${\bf s}_n \DEF {\bf b} - {\bf A} {\bf y}_n$. We address the question whether the smoothed residuals can ultimately become markedly smaller than the primary ones. To investigate this, we present a roundoff error analysis of the smoothing algorithms. It shows that the ultimately attainable accuracy of the smoothed iterates, measured in the norm of the corresponding residuals, is, in general, not higher than that of the primary iterates. Nevertheless, smoothing can be used to produce certain residuals, most notably those of the minimum residual method, with higher attainable accuracy than by other frequently used algorithms.

Keywords:

BibTeX
@Techreport{GR99_256,
  author = {M. H. Gutknecht and M. Rozloznik},
  title = {Residual smoothing techniques: do they improve the limiting accuracy of iterative solvers?},
  institution = {Seminar for Applied Mathematics, ETH Z{\"u}rich},
  number = {1999-22},
  address = {Switzerland},
  url = {https://www.sam.math.ethz.ch/sam_reports/reports_final/reports1999/1999-22.pdf },
  year = {1999}
}

Disclaimer
© Copyright for documents on this server remains with the authors. Copies of these documents made by electronic or mechanical means including information storage and retrieval systems, may only be employed for personal use. The administrators respectfully request that authors inform them when any paper is published to avoid copyright infringement. Note that unauthorised copying of copyright material is illegal and may lead to prosecution. Neither the administrators nor the Seminar for Applied Mathematics (SAM) accept any liability in this respect. The most recent version of a SAM report may differ in formatting and style from published journal version. Do reference the published version if possible (see SAM Publications).

JavaScript has been disabled in your browser